RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Identifying the risk for restenosis is of critical importance in the stent selection process of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, we sought to determine if a history of clinical recurrence (CR) after PCI increases the risk of CR after treatment of a de novo lesion in another coronary artery. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all 12,763 patients who underwent PCI between 1993 and 2004 and selected patients with two or more interventions in two different native vessels. These patients were divided into two groups: patients without CR, and patients with CR after the first PCI. Clinical recurrence was defined as revascular-isation of the target vessel by either PCI or CABG within one year. RESULTS: A total of 1010 patients with two or more interventions in two different native vessels were identified: 727 patients without and 283 patients with CR after the first PCI. Baseline patient characteristics and conventional risk factors were comparable between the two groups. Patients with a history of CR had a higher risk of CR after a second intervention in a second vessel (OR=3.4, 95% CI=2.3 to 4.9). A total of 112 patients also had a third intervention in a third native vessel: 12 patients with two CR, 30 patients with one CR and 70 patients with no CR after the first two interventions. CR rates in these patients were 50, 17 and 3%, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with a history of CR have a markedly increased risk of developing CR after a second or third PCI in a different coronary artery. Therefore, in the decision-making process on whether to use a bare metal stent or drug-eluting stent, the history of CR is a simple and powerful aid. (Neth Heart J 2008;16:376-81.).
RESUMO
BACKGROUND.: New developments have made 16-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) a promising technique for detecting significant coronary stenoses. At present, there is a paucity of data on the relation between fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement and MDCT stenosis detection. OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between the anatomical severity of coronary artery disease detected by MDCT and functional severity measured by fractional flow reserve (FFR). METHODS.: We studied 53 patients (39 men and 14 women, age 62.5+/-8.1 years) with single-vessel disease scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). All patients underwent MDCT scanning one day prior to PCI and FFR was measured before PCI in the target vessel. RESULTS.: MDCT analysis could be performed in 52 of 53 patients (98.1%) and all patients had adequate FFR and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) measurements. The mean stenosis diameters calculated by MDCT and QCA were 67.0+/-11.6% and 60.8+/-11.6% respectively. No significant relation was found between MDCT and QCA (r=0.22, p=0.12) The mean FFR in all patients was 0.67+/-0.18. A relation of r=-0.46 (p=0.0006) between QCA and FFR was found. In contrast, no relation between MDCT and FFR could be demonstrated (r=-0.09, p=0.50). Furthermore, a high incidence of false-positive and false-negative findings was present in both diagnostic modalities. CONCLUSION.: There is no clear relation between the anatomical and functional severity of coronary artery disease as defined by MDCT and FFR. Therefore, functional assessment of coronary artery disease remains mandatory for clinical decisionmaking. (Neth Heart J 2007;15:5-11.).
